Difference between revisions of "Talk:Utah"

From FamilySearch Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Thank YOU / YOUR Article is Selected: new section)
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I tried to change the [[Portal:United States of America]] link to [[United States]], but the preview showed the links would appear right after the Utah News & Events heading. I don't understand why editing the existing link makes the line drop down on the page. Therefore, I didn't complete the change. --[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 20:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
+
{{archive box | auto=yes }} {{Discussion Conventions}}
  
:I don't know why the preview looked like that. I've made the change and there was no problem with the preview before I saved it. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 21:24, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
+
It looks like to me that the Sidebar is still leaking over the text and headings. Do you need some help getting this to work? [[User:Jamestanner|James L. Tanner]] 22:02, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
  
:Maybe the preview looks different because I'm using a Mac OS X. I will test the preview on a PC. --[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 21:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
+
Looks fixed now. Thanks for all your work. [[User:Jamestanner|James L. Tanner]] 22:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
  
=== First Things First  ===
+
== Thank YOU / YOUR Article is Selected ==
  
I'm uncomfortable with almost every element of design on this page. We seem to have put the unimportant and unnecessary things first. Even the right-hand flag box takes up an unnecessarily wide swath of expensive real estate without conveying an iota of genealogically useful information. The role of a state page should be to serve as a Table of Contents to the rest of that state's pages. It can also serve as an attention grabber. As a table-of-contents to the other state pages this design gets a poor grade.
+
The [https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/FamilySearch_Research_Wiki FamilySearch Research Wiki] is delighted to let you know that the “'''Utah'''” article you helped create will be highlighted on the [https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/Main_Page Main page] of the Wiki. It will appear '''April 9, 2012''' and remain for seven days. Thank you for your excellent work – you have given readers/researchers important access to records. Your contributions are appreciated and will assist others in finding their ancestors. You have made a difference in research!
  
On the the above the fold part of the page only 1/4 of the space is available for discretionary use, and even that is not used for attention grabbing or top priority purposes. The two most important parts of this page are completely hidden "below the fold." Our readers favor the county pages most, but all they get is a map below the fold. Our librarian-consultants spend a lot of time working on topics. In this presentation we see neither of these two elements on the first screen on the valuable real estate. The purpose of this page should be to move our readers to the places they can learn the-mostest-the-fastest or at least grab their interest. By hiding the important stuff (moving it below the fold) we have devalued this page.
+
'''Please note''':
  
The topics list in a horizontal layout have lost their table-of-contents look and ease of reading. The TOC layout is an important hint that they can use the topics to reach further pages of information.  
+
We invite you to do any enhancing, editing or changing to this article before we post it. If you are considering an edit we ask that it be completed by '''April 8, 2012'''. If you feel this article is not ready to be highlighted, please let us know. Thank you for your time and effort!
  
Therefore, I propose that we should put the Topics in a table-of-contents style list at the top of the page. I also propose that we likewise move the counties list to the top as well. Let's remember the purpose of this page and put first things first.
 
  
I also have my doubts about allowing the automatic Table of Contents for the page to appear. On most state pages it is wisely suppressed. I say wisely because the purpose of this page should be to serve as a table of contents to the rest of the pages for this state. The page TOC is distracting under those circumstances.
 
  
The Counties of Utah section needs an alphabetical listing of those counties. Some of our readers are geographically challenged and would be searching the map for too long looking for Loa County when they could find it instantly on an alphabetical list. I like having both a list, and a map, but if forced to choose only one, the better choice is the alphabetical list of counties.  [[User:DiltsGD|DiltsGD]] 14:12, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
+
This '''Utah''' article will rotate with a '''New York''' article on an every other weekly basis.<br> <br><br>
 
 
:I think you make good points. I agree that the most useful information should be listed first. For me that would include a brief paragraph about the article subject, in this case the state of Utah. I like the use of a sidebar with a list of topics, this page was set-up differently, to test a different layout, as some users had commented that they found having a topic sidebar, with the wider navigation bar in beta, squeezed the content in the middle too much. I agree that if a topics sidebar is employed, that it does negate the need for a TOC. I also agree that having both a map and a alphabetical list of sub-divisions would be wise. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 14:20, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 
::One point, it would be fine if it was still the Wiki skin but we are dealing with FamilySearch skin - squeezing the topic sidebar to the point it looks weird due to fixed-width right side box. [[User:Wdsamuelsen|Wdsamuelsen]] 15:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)&nbsp;
 
 
 
&nbsp;
 
 
 
I would like to see all the State pages with the same format. I teach beginning genealogy and find it is easier for people to understand when things are uniform.
 
 
 
The Research Outlines were great because after using one or two, we knew what to expect. CyndisList is a great example of uniformity. I can go to her list and research something quickly because I know what to expect.
 
 
 
Please look at Vermont or New York State pages which mimic the old Research Outines.&nbsp;Please keep the Wiki Pages for the States in the same format so the newbies I try to help will not be having to constantly relearn how to access information about their area of interest.  
 
 
 
&nbsp; Thanks
 

Revision as of 18:25, 5 April 2012


Archives

Talk Conventions

  • Please post new messages at the bottom of the page to prevent confusion.
  • Please sign your comments. Type ~~~~ after your text.
  • Please use section headings to separate conversation topics.

See: Wikiquette, Be nice, and Talk page guidelines.

Start a new talk topic.
Please post your comments on this page by clicking the link above. This will automatically format the page so all you have to do is type your comments.





It looks like to me that the Sidebar is still leaking over the text and headings. Do you need some help getting this to work? James L. Tanner 22:02, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Looks fixed now. Thanks for all your work. James L. Tanner 22:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank YOU / YOUR Article is Selected

The FamilySearch Research Wiki is delighted to let you know that the “Utah” article you helped create will be highlighted on the Main page of the Wiki. It will appear April 9, 2012 and remain for seven days. Thank you for your excellent work – you have given readers/researchers important access to records. Your contributions are appreciated and will assist others in finding their ancestors. You have made a difference in research!

Please note:

We invite you to do any enhancing, editing or changing to this article before we post it. If you are considering an edit we ask that it be completed by April 8, 2012. If you feel this article is not ready to be highlighted, please let us know. Thank you for your time and effort!


This Utah article will rotate with a New York article on an every other weekly basis.