Difference between revisions of "Talk:Salt Lake County, Utah"

From FamilySearch Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
Gary,<br>you bloated the article. Now taking up too much space instead of keeping it simple. My original was simple format. This allow for flexibile expansion. Your format is not allowing any flexibility and splitting off any part of the article to form sub-article.<br>[[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 19:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC) <!-- Tidy found serious XHTML errors -->
+
Gary,<br>you bloated the article. Now taking up too much space instead of keeping it simple. My original was simple format. This allow for flexibile expansion. Your format is not allowing any flexibility and splitting off any part of the article to form sub-article.<br>[[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 19:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 
+
<!-- Tidy found serious XHTML errors -->
Also, something else to consider - the chain link you put in at top, is telling others that the categories aren't important. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 19:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC) <!-- Tidy found serious XHTML errors -->
+
Also, something else to consider - the chain link you put in at top, is telling others that the categories aren't important. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 19:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 
+
<!-- Tidy found serious XHTML errors -->
I'm changing the Unincorporated Communites back to the simple format. There is no need for the box at all. We need to keep the article short and simple. Researchers do not care for "fancy boxes". Only the data. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 20:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC) <!-- Tidy found serious XHTML errors -->
+
I'm changing the Unincorporated Communites back to the simple format. There is no need for the box at all. We need to keep the article short and simple. Researchers do not care for "fancy boxes". Only the data. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 20:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 
+
<!-- Tidy found serious XHTML errors -->
<br>
+
<br>I do not agree. A county page is not just an article. The page links are just an easy way to return to a previous page, Categories have a different purpose to get a page included&nbsp;on a category page. Formating lists into columns make it much eaiser to find information and looks much better.&nbsp; Many of the portal pages have lists in columns. [[User:Garysturn|Garysturn]] 01:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 
+
<!-- Tidy found serious XHTML errors --><!-- Tidy found serious XHTML errors -->
I do not agree. A county page is not just an article.  
 
 
 
The page links are just an easy way to return to a previous page, Categories have a different purpose to get a page included&nbsp;on a category page.  
 
 
 
Formating lists into columns make it much eaiser to find information and looks much better.&nbsp; Many of the portal pages have lists in columns.  
 
 
 
[[User:Garysturn|Garysturn]] 01:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC) <!-- Tidy found serious XHTML errors --><!-- Tidy found serious XHTML errors -->
 

Revision as of 19:36, 29 September 2008

Gary,
you bloated the article. Now taking up too much space instead of keeping it simple. My original was simple format. This allow for flexibile expansion. Your format is not allowing any flexibility and splitting off any part of the article to form sub-article.
dsammy 19:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC) Also, something else to consider - the chain link you put in at top, is telling others that the categories aren't important. dsammy 19:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC) I'm changing the Unincorporated Communites back to the simple format. There is no need for the box at all. We need to keep the article short and simple. Researchers do not care for "fancy boxes". Only the data. dsammy 20:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I do not agree. A county page is not just an article. The page links are just an easy way to return to a previous page, Categories have a different purpose to get a page included on a category page. Formating lists into columns make it much eaiser to find information and looks much better.  Many of the portal pages have lists in columns. Garysturn 01:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)