|(21 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)|
|−|'''Help us improve the indexing and arbitration of this project.''' Click the '''Edit This Page '''button to make suggestions. Messages will be removed after careful review by support and any updates will be posted to the Project Updates page. Many commonly asked questions, such as indexing crossed out information, have already been answered in the [https://help.familysearch.org/publishing/347/102817_f.SAL_Public.html Basic indexing instructions]. |+|
| || |
the arbitrators not following the maiden ????? 'maiden . '. the name the the . I do . this() I to and . '''.'''
|−|: <br>______________________________________________________<br><br>On the subject of Maiden names, Called support on the subject because arbitrators are not following project instructions. This is the response, "It is the custom in some families to not give female children middle names in the hope that they will use their maiden name after they marry. It should be indexed with her given name not in the surname field?????? Totally conficts with Project Instructions. My question, which is correct and if the instructions have changed. can you do an update? ' ''Please use slide number 7 as your guideline for maiden names. ' ''If there are updates they will be on the updates page. Project specific guidelines are often contained within the presentations provided. | |
|−|<br>As an arbitrator, I am seeing the birth "Year" entered on Texas Death records when it is blank on the form. I was always told to not assume or enter information into a place name when the place was not on the form. I was taught not to "calculate" an age or year and enter it from other information. Yet the field helps (In the Birth Place Year) say that if you can determine the year by looking around the form, to do so. Does this mean that we can now "calculate" the birth year from the Age and Death year ( if given) on the form? I thought this instruction applied to other types of records and not specifically for a birth year. I can find nothing in the basic indexing guidelines for Dates that tell us not to "assume". I will keep entering "blank" unless told otherwise. But indexers are calculating based on the field helps for that field. ''' We do not calculate dates.''' | |
Latest revision as of 16:33, 23 February 2012
This discussion page is no longer in use. Please use the discussion tab on the FAQ page to make a submission. (Any currently posted issues will be resolved and removed.) The wiki now accepts other observations and questions about the project, not just project update issues. The new Wiki Presentation will guide you through the process of making submissions and how they will be handled.
Why are the arbitrators not following the presentation slide re: maiden and surnames????? "A woman's middle name may be her maiden name. Determine this by comparing it with her father's surname. Index both the maiden name and the surname in the SURNAME FIELD." EVERY time I do this it is marked wrong. Can't something be done about this??? I just had an arbitrator knock off 20 points (OUCH) because of this. I have a 98% arbritration results and that 20 points is really going to mess that up and I'm only following your directions. I'm just frustrated. HELP! Thanks - Thank you for your desire to correctly index the records by following the instructions.