Difference between revisions of "Talk:FamilySearch Indexing: US, Texas—Deaths, 1890–1976, Project Updates"

From FamilySearch Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Help us improve the indexing and arbitration of this project.''' Click the '''Edit This Page '''button to make suggestions. Messages will be removed after careful review by support and any updates will be posted to the Project Updates page. Many commonly asked questions, such as indexing crossed out information, have already been answered in the [https://help.familysearch.org/publishing/347/102817_f.SAL_Public.html Basic indexing instructions].
+
{{Discussion Notice}}
 
 
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
Line 36: Line 35:
  
 
When it countains both city and county - what should be typed?&nbsp; Both?  
 
When it countains both city and county - what should be typed?&nbsp; Both?  
 
<br>
 
 
Record stamped "Duplicate Filed for Correction and Completion". Are these records to be indexed? I am indexing them as they are not an '''exact''' duplicate of the previous image.&nbsp; Arbitrator is marking me wrong when I index them. Could you please add a slide or at least a sentence or two in project updates regarding these "Duplicate Filed for Correction and Completion" images and how to handle them?&nbsp;&nbsp; '''We follow the basic indexing guidelines if we have no direction to do otherwise.&nbsp; Our policy at this time is not to repeat these guidelines in the project updates because they are not updates.&nbsp; There are links to the basic indexing guidelines in the Project Links tab.&nbsp; '''<br>
 
 
QUESTION: For the marriage status, what do I record when the form says "Separated"? This is on one that has them write in the status rather than check a box. I am entering it as Married. Is that correct?
 
 
'''Without any additional information, your decision makes good sense.''' &lt;/fck:hr&gt;
 
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
 
<br>
 
<br>

Revision as of 03:59, 5 February 2012

This discussion page is no longer in use. Please use the discussion tab on the FAQ page to make a submission. (Any currently posted issues will be resolved and removed.) The wiki now accepts other observations and questions about the project, not just project update issues.  The new Wiki Presentation will guide you through the process of making submissions and how they will be handled.



Why are the arbitrators not following the presentation slide re: maiden and surnames?????   "A woman's middle name may be her maiden name. Determine this by comparing it with her father's surname. Index both the maiden name and the surname in the SURNAME FIELD."  EVERY time I do this it is marked wrong.  Can't something be done about this??? I just had an arbitrator knock off 20 points (OUCH) because of this.  I have a 98% arbritration results and that 20 points is really going to mess that up and I'm only following your directions. I'm just frustrated.  HELP!    Thanks


   

<fck:hr>
Q: As these records are from Texas, there are many hispanic names. How should we deal with the hispanic custom of giving a child two surnames (one from the mother and one from the father)? Is the mother's maiden name included as a middle name for the child and the father's as the surname, or should both be surnames?

P.S. I have usually only seen the names written as :

FIRST//MOTHER'S MAIDEN (in middle name position)//FATHER'S SURNAME

but I have seen

FIRST//MIDDLE//MOTHER'S MAIDEN//FATHER'S SURNAME

Should these instances be keyed differently?

  ______________________________________________________

1/25/12 -- Could you please update the field helps for the birth year?  Currently it states:
Birth Year

Type a four-digit number for the year. If no year or only a two-digit number was recorded, you may be able to determine the year from other data on the image or from the previous or next image. If you still cannot determine the full four-digit year, type what was written on the record.

If the year was not recorded or was written as a variation of the word "unknown," press Tab to mark this field as blank.

Until the field helps is corrected, it is going to continue to cause confusion for both indexers and arbitrators.



QUESTION:  Some certificates are showing City, State AND Country.  (These are Texas/Mexico border counties)  Some are showing city and state, but the city and states are in Mexico.   I have been indexing the state, only to have it changed to Mexico in arbitration.  Exactly what should we index in the Birth State or Country field?  Thanks.

Birth City or County
Type the name of the city or town where the individual was born. If no city or town was recorded and a birth county was, index the county in this field.

When it countains both city and county - what should be typed?  Both?