Difference between revisions of "FamilySearch Wiki talk:Featured Articles"

From FamilySearch Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(thank you: new section)
Line 83: Line 83:
== thank you  ==
== thank you  ==
Find a Grave hasbeen removed much thanks for saying something. [[User:HoleDL|Dawne]] 22:33, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Find  A Grave hasbeen removed much thanks for saying something. [[User:HoleDL|Dawne]] 22:33, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:33, 5 October 2011


Which option in the preferences has the ability to control the featured article star? -Fran 13:43, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Good question. The template code was developed in Wikipedia where they have a CCS class that is used to control the display of these topicons as I don't have access to the CSS code, I removed the class from the template, thus enabling it for all users. Bottom line there is no user preference to show/hide the featured article star in the FSwiki, so I have removed the reference to one from the article. --Steve 16:25, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Back to dates

In looking at Wikipedia and WikiHow we find their archive articles are dated. We know that we are in our infancy but we want to feature new articles much more often than we have been, as I looked at the the history of this archive it seems to be  desires to go back to what was done in early April of 2010 with dates and boxed articles because there will come a time shortly when we are adding new articles much more often. Can someone help us go to that again? Much Thanks, Dawne 18:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Dawne, I agree, I think it is useful to show when the articles were featured on the main page. I will rework the page using the layout last used in April 2010. --Steve 16:36, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Dates and featured articles

Steve thank you that will be wonderful, l thank you so much for reworking it.

We are most grateful to you.

Dawne 17:03, 8 July 2011 (UTC)



you are grand!


this is wonderful Steve thank you so much the archives look so good. The user box for those working on the featured artcles looks fine, yes go a head with it. again Steve thank you.Dawne 20:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 


I may not be understanding, how can I put a bronze star on all the articles we have featured thus far or can I? 

Much thanks Steve,

 Dawne 19:17, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Dawne, I think you already discovered the answer to your question, but for the benefit of others -- The way to add the star to an article is by using the {{Featured article}} template. Do this by adding the code {{Featured article}} to the bottom of an article, just before the categories. --Steve 16:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Counting the hits

I would like to be able to have the wiki keep track of the hits Community makes as they look at the Featured Articles

This is what I hope to show which is in an Excel file but I want it to be transparent in the Wki:

Date           Featured Article                  hits before posted       hits when taken off

2011  Poland                                                1,378                          

7/19/2011  Research logs                             9,350                     9498

7/20/2011 United States History                   1,613                  

7/21/2011 Involving Children & Youth in FH    645                   

7/22/2011Tracing LDS Ancestors                  5,780        

I have no idea how to do this PLEASE any thoughts?

Dawne 17:03, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

We'd like to feature the page view count on the archive page, not the talk page. So, how can we edit the Archive page so that more detail can be added to the daily changes in featured articles. We are tracking what the page view count was on the day the article was featured and what was the page view count on the day the article was removed from the Main page as a featured article? Since we are changing featured articles on a daily basis, the Archive page should probably be changed to a daily view of what was featured on a given day. --Fran 15:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Featured article committee

Please would someone consider making one more section in the Featured Articles so the committee could be added. Dawne 14:55, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Dawne, I took your comment to mean, an extra section in the FA navbox {{Featured content}}. I have therefore added a new link to the FamilySearch Wiki:Featured Article Committee to that navbox. If this was a wrong interpretation, please let me know. --Steve (talk | contribs) 15:55, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Set the bar higher?

I don't mean to be disrespectful regarding the hard work contributors have put into the Find A Grave article, but how exactly does this article meet the specifications set for a featured article?

Juxtaposing this article against other featured articles like New Sweden or Maryland History, I see such a wide gap on so many levels that I'm baffled why we'd indicate that they're on the same plane. If an article like Find A Grave can achieve Featured or Bronze status, it seems like we may need to figure out how to set the bar higher for Bronze status.

To Feature an article is basically saying "This is among the best of the wiki." The Find A Grave article is simply not the best of the best. Unless someone can skillfully defend how it meets the specs set forth in FamilySearch Wiki:Featured article criteria, this page's Featured status should be removed. RitcheyMT 21:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

thank you

Find  A Grave hasbeen removed much thanks for saying something. Dawne 22:33, 5 October 2011 (UTC)