Talk:Prioritized List of Online England County Church Records

To Batsondl and DunnPB

I do really like this new format for a table, and think it is a lot better than the old table on England Church Records. The idea of using different background colours to signify index or index/images is a lot better than having two seperate columns. However shouldn't this be used to replace the old table on England Church Records, rather than making a whole new page and partially duplicating content?

Suggestions

1. I note there are various grammar errors that need fixing, and record collections incorrectly ordered by coverage 2. Having "Most complete coverage", 2nd most, 3rd most etc. implies a very definitive and precise order, which as I have discussed earlier on the England Church Records talk page. Instead I suggest:

{| class="wikitable" width="75%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0"
 * width="10%" bgcolor="#b4bec4" align="left" |
 * width="60%" bgcolor="#b4bec4" align="left" | ONLINE RECORDS'
 * width="15%" bgcolor="#b4bec4" align="left" |
 * width="10%" bgcolor="#b4bec4" align="left" |County (pre-1974)
 * width="15%" bgcolor="#b4bec4" align="left" |Most complete coverage
 * width="15%" bgcolor="#b4bec4" align="left" |
 * width="15%" bgcolor="#b4bec4" align="left" |
 * width="15%" bgcolor="#b4bec4" align="left" |Least complete coverage
 * width="15%" bgcolor="#b4bec4" align="left" |Offline and other records
 * width="15%" bgcolor="#b4bec4" align="left" |Offline and other records