How to Successfully Apply the Genealogical Proof Standard

March 24, 2016  - by 

*This is the third of a three-part series exploring how to use the genealogical proof standard in your family history research. Read part one here, and read part two here.

Over the past two weeks, we’ve explored the genealogical proof standard (GPS), an essential tool that all genealogists should have in their toolbox. In last week’s article, we took a deeper look at the first three steps of the standard: (1) conduct reasonably exhaustive research, (2) check your facts and cite your sources, and (3) analyze and correctly interpret the evidence.

This article focuses on the final two steps of the genealogical proof standard: resolve contradictory evidence and coherently write research findings.

Resolve Any Contradictory Evidence

“The standard is about putting together and weaving and threading and knitting different disparate items of information and evidences into a conclusion that will stand on its own,” said professional genealogist James Ison at the 2016 RootsTech conference.

Of all the steps in the GPS, this step can be one of the easiest to overlook. We’ve all found mismatching evidence at some point in our research, haven’t we? When this happens, it can be convenient to simply discount the bits of information that don’t seem to align with your gut feeling—but that wouldn’t be in line with the GPS.

The most successful researchers understand and anticipate contradictory evidence. They acknowledge, evaluate, and attempt to provide answers for each variation, demonstrating their analytical and reasoning skills. Certified genealogist Harold Henderson wrote about the importance of paying attention to contradictions: “Contradictions are to genealogists what dust bunnies are to house cleaners. They may annoy us, but they are also an important part of our life. And in both cases, to sweep them under the rug would betray our calling.”

Evaluating evidence is a process that takes place over time and through a series of phases. According to the FamilySearch wiki, “[Evaluating evidence] starts as soon as you find a document that must be evaluated to see if it is relevant to the family you are researching. It continues as you transfer the information from the source to your genealogical records and compose a source footnote. In that phase you are evaluating in two ways: (1) a preliminary evaluation of the reliability of the source, and (2) a comparison and contrast of data on the source with other information about the family to see if it corroborates or contradicts other sources.”

Here are three simple ways to handle contradicting evidence:

  1. Ask Questions. As you come across conflicting fragments of information in your research that you’re unsure how to handle, take a step back and consider the following questions:

    • When and where was the record created?
    • What information is missing or incomplete from the record?
    • How was the information recorded?
    • Who created the record?
    • How reliable is the information in the record?

    By asking these questions, you’ll begin to piece bits of information together while discovering what other research still needs to be done.

  2. Become an Expert in Your Area of Records. According to James Ison in his RootsTech presentation, answers to tough genealogical questions will come as you become an expert in your area of records: “Using the family history catalog, you just put in the county, and it lists all the records that FamilySearch has ever microfilmed for that area,” says Ison. “You can go out to the USGenWeb, which is organized by county. You can go search the historical societies and the genealogical societies that are associated with your areas of interest. And then you make a research plan, and you keep a research log so you know where you’ve been and what you’ve found.”

  3. Look at the Evidence from Different Angles. Compiling evidence is one thing; making sense of it is another. Henderson says, “Try using tables, charts, lists, timelines, maps, diagrams, sticky notes—anything that might offer a useful new perspective. Don’t expect to find the one ideal way of organizing them; there is no such thing. The point is to look at it from all different angles, in different combinations, in order to find patterns that weren’t obvious at first.”

Write Your Research Findings

For many, writing research findings can be the most intimidating step of the genealogical proof standard. But it’s a great habit to get into, even if you’re just doing research for yourself. And don’t worry—you don’t have to be a flawless writer!

“You don’t have to worry about grammar when you’re doing this if you’re writing for yourself,” says Ison. “If you’re writing it to have it published, that’s a different story. But [if you are] writing it for yourself and your family, new ideas pop up as you’re writing. You can have it all in your notebook with your different notes from deeds and everything. It’s only when you write that new things will occur to you.”

Many genealogists recommend keeping a continuous journal or research log as you go. By doing this, you’re more prepared to remember the information you’ve already learned.

“I thought I’d write my proof argument one time, and it’d be done,” continued Ison. “But it’s iterative. And it’s best to actually write as you’re doing your research.”

The best way to learn how to write a good proof argument is to study national journals such as The American Genealogist, National Genealogical Society Quarterly, and The New England Historical and Genealogical Register.

What tips or tricks would you share about applying the genealogical proof standard? Tweet us @RootsTechConf.

Read parts one and two:

Understanding the Genealogical Proof Standard

3 Ways to Ensure Your Research Meets the Genealogical Proof Standard

How to Apply the Genealogical Proof Standard Successfully

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments

  1. “Many genealogists recommend keeping a continuous journal or research log as you go. By doing this, you’re more prepared to remember the information you’ve already learned.” If you use Family Tree in familysearch.org you can use the “Discussions” section for this. After you create a discussion you are the only one who can edit it. Others can comment on it, but can’t edit it. You can delete any discussion that you created when it is no longer useful.

  2. Esto es muy importante para que nuestra investigación, sea comprobable con certificados y demás datos, de esta forma nuestra historia familiar estará muy bien fundamentada. En algunos casos es dificil encontrar registros, pues aun no se han indexado.Gracias por los artículos.

  3. As a new person to RootsMagic from PAF I am very confused by the way I am supposed to show my source. There are so many choices and when Ancestry just has the title and film number what am I supposed by choose from the list shown. I really need guidance with this. PAF was so simple compared to RootsMagic.

    1. Kathy,

      Find, Take, Teach, is meant to help the general membership of the church engage in family history and temple work which we have been commanded/prodded/begged to do for more than 170 years. Having used this formula in my own calling as an FHC I can testify that it is inspired. Just 5 years ago I was your typical “youngster” that never wanted to touch family history due to the overwhelming checklist of GPS that “oldsters” wanted to impose upon me any time that I even thought about doing family history and temple work. While I now use the GPS in my own research, I will say that I wouldn’t have ever had the interest and enjoyment that I now have if I didn’t have some quick wins, and quickly take them to the temple. Find, Take, Teach is about the Spirit of Elijah. It’s about helping the general membership of the church ,who other wise would have no desire, to engage in this great work and to help them become Saviors on Mount Zion. Genealogy Proof Standard is great, and doing “reasonably exhaustive research” is beneficial for every one, and will help cleanup the book that is to be “worthy of all acceptation”. But focusing on the GPS and holding every single person to that standard kills the spirit of this beautiful work, and is much like the Pharisees who were so obsessed with the law that they were blinded to the spirit, and even blinded to the Savior who stood in their midst. May we as followers of Christ never be pharisaical and may we ever strive to bring more into his kingdom, those alive, and deceased. To do this we will need “youngsters” and “oldsters” alike with “Find, Take, Teach” and the “Genealogical Proof Standard” both having their rightful place in hastening the work of the Lord.

        1. Yes, well put. I guess I would be called an Oldster but most important is following the direction of our prophet and the 12. Direction and council will change as the work moves forward. Don’t get bogged down in the letter as previous reply said. Follow the Spirit and you will be guided right.

  4. I M TRYING TWO FINE MORE OF MY FAMILY ON MY DAD SIZEOF THE FAMILY ROBERT LEE EWRY AND MY MOM SIZE OF THE FAMILYKATHINE MARIE HANARHAN

    1. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. There were 3 old links that have been updated and should now be working.

  5. I wish it was possible to get this 3-part series as either a single PDF or a printable version. I want to keep these and scribble on them for reference, but they won’t print from Firefox. All that prints is page 1. 🙁

    1. Do you have Evernote? That’s where I’ve save it and while I haven’t printed it, I’m sure it would print from there. Also, it might print from Chrome instead.