Talk:Riverton FamilySearch Library - Revision history

Cottrells: /* Section headings */ new section

2011-04-15T18:21:15Z

Section headings: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 15 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<br>		<br>
		+
		+	== Section headings ==
		+
		+	I have amended the section headings to start with the level 2 headers. The article title uses level 1 and so sections within the page should start with level 2 (see [[Help:Wiki_markup#Section_headings\|Help - Section headings]] and [[Help:Section]]). I have also removed the section of links that had been manually created and replaced it with the template {{tl\|TOClimit}} which can be used to restrict the items listed in the Table of Contents to the main sections. --[[User:Cottrells\|Steve]] 18:21, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

RoachA: removed content due to high traffic to this page

2010-05-12T21:54:40Z

removed content due to high traffic to this page

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 12 May 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~Dear Riverton Family History Center (Director): ~~	+	<br>
−		+
−	~~I would direct your attention to the Guiding Principles and Policies articles on the FamilySearch Research Wiki.~~	+
−		+
−	~~Here are some suggestions on how to bring your page into compliance:~~	+
−		+
−	It is not appropriate to "advertise" your center. Listing names of people from various stakes is probably not appropriate. Many of the resoures you list would be perfect for the Riverton, Utah page, and your FHC could be one of those resources--to help people do Riverton research. I see that there is a link on that page to your center, that is perfect. But the FHC page is more complete than the Riverton page.  I think it should be just the opposite. Let me know how you feel it should be changed to be more in tune with the policies.	+
−		+
−	~~Thanks!!~~	+
−		+
−	~~Jimgreene 18:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)~~ <br>	+
−		+
−	~~== Reason for article deletion ==~~	+
−		+
−	This article is about a [[The Vision: Why We Built FamilySearch Wiki#Subjects_outside_the_wiki.E2.80.99s_scope\|subject outside the scope of this wiki]]. If the {{PAGENAME}} has any specific local resources for research then these should be listed in the article about the locality. --[[User:Cottrells\|Steve]] 07:24, 2 September 2009 (UTC)	+

RoachA: moved Talk:Riverton South Utah Family History Center to Talk:Riverton FamilySearch Library: Center name has changed

2010-05-12T21:52:30Z

moved Talk:Riverton South Utah Family History Center to Talk:Riverton FamilySearch Library: Center name has changed

← Older revision

Revision as of 21:52, 12 May 2010

Cottrells: /* Reason for article deletion */ new section

2009-09-02T07:24:07Z

Reason for article deletion: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:24, 2 September 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Jimgreene 18:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC) <br>		Jimgreene 18:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC) <br>
		+
		+	== Reason for article deletion ==
		+
		+	This article is about a [[The Vision: Why We Built FamilySearch Wiki#Subjects_outside_the_wiki.E2.80.99s_scope\|subject outside the scope of this wiki]]. If the {{PAGENAME}} has any specific local resources for research then these should be listed in the article about the locality. --[[User:Cottrells\|Steve]] 07:24, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

GreeneJR: New page: Dear Riverton Family History Center (Director): I would direct your attention to the Guiding Principles and Policies articles on the FamilySearch Research Wiki. Here are some sugg...

2009-03-09T18:08:11Z

New page: Dear Riverton Family History Center (Director): I would direct your attention to the Guiding Principles and Policies articles on the FamilySearch Research Wiki. Here are some sugg...

New page

Dear Riverton Family History Center (Director): 

I would direct your attention to the Guiding Principles and Policies articles on the FamilySearch Research Wiki.

Here are some suggestions on how to bring your page into compliance:

It is not appropriate to "advertise" your center. Listing names of people from various stakes is probably not appropriate. Many of the resoures you list would be perfect for the Riverton, Utah page, and your FHC could be one of those resources--to help people do Riverton research. I see that there is a link on that page to your center, that is perfect. But the FHC page is more complete than the Riverton page.  I think it should be just the opposite. Let me know how you feel it should be changed to be more in tune with the policies.

Thanks!!

Jimgreene 18:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC) <br>