Talk:Main Page

From FamilySearch Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
(cut/paste to archive 2)
m (removed templates for source and copyright)
(26 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{archive box | auto=yes }} {{Discussion Conventions}} [[Talk:Main Page/Archive 3]]
+
{{talk header}}  
  
 +
== changing the Main Page?  ==
  
== Side bar mock-up ==
+
Today we changed the Main Page, instead of putting a new Featured Article up we put up a WikiProject, what do you think about that? We like the idea because then the project isn't buried. What if we had Featured Articles and one WikiProject each week on the Main Page? [[User:HoleDL|Dawne]] 17:32, 15 August 2011 (UTC) [[FamilySearch Wiki:Featured Article Committee|Featured Article Committee Member]]
  
On right or on left?
+
== Search criteria  ==
  
{| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1"
+
A guide on how to get the best results from a search would be appreciated, i.e., is order importent, what triggers the search, how are the words searched for prioritized? I ask this as I searched for LDS membership records in England in the 1800s. All I got was various demoninations in the USA. I just don't understand how the algorithm works. <span style="font-size: 90%">— Preceding [[FamilySearch Wiki:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Laytonr1|Laytonr1]] ([[User talk:Laytonr1|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Laytonr1|contribs]]) 04:37, October 28, 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
|-
+
| '''[[Main Page|FamilySearch Wiki Home]]'''<br>&nbsp;[[Help Options|Help]]<br>&nbsp;Wiki tour<br>&nbsp;Community &amp; Forums
+
|-
+
| '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}'''<br>&nbsp;[[{{SUBJECTPAGENAME}}|Article]]<br>&nbsp;[[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|Talk]]
+
----
+
 
+
&nbsp;Edit this page<br>&nbsp;Printable version<br>&nbsp;History of edits<br>&nbsp;Watch
+
 
+
|-
+
| <inputbox>
+
type=search
+
width=18
+
searchbuttonlabel=Search
+
buttonlabel=Exact Match
+
</inputbox>
+
&nbsp;[http://forums.familysearch.org/en/forumdisplay.php?f=56 Report search problems]<br>&nbsp;Browse by: [[Browse by Country|Country]], [[:Category:Contents|Category]]
+
 
+
|-
+
| '''Toolbox'''<br>&nbsp;Edit &amp; Contribute<br>&nbsp;[[Create a page|Create a new page]]<br>&nbsp;Upload a file<br>&nbsp;[[Special:WhatLinksHere/{{FULLPAGENAME}}|What links here]]<br>&nbsp;[[Special:RecentChangesLinked/{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Related changes]]<br>&nbsp;[[Special:SpecialPages|Special pages]]<br>&nbsp;Permanent link
+
|-
+
| '''Personal tools'''<br>&nbsp;My user page<br>&nbsp;My talk<br>&nbsp;My sandbox<br>&nbsp;My watchlist<br>&nbsp;My contributions<br>&nbsp;My preferences
+
|}
+
 
+
=== Info on side bar mock-up  ===
+
 
+
The following were moved to the bottom of the main page
+
 
+
*Guiding principles
+
*Policies
+
 
+
Should every word be initial cap, the first word, or what?
+
 
+
Other items may appear depending on whether signed in and rights.  
+
 
+
==== Box 1  ====
+
 
+
This is first navigation box that they see.  
+
 
+
*Wiki Tour is a new page?
+
*Community &amp; Forums would go to an article discussing
+
**Community Center
+
**Community Meetings
+
**Forums<br>
+
 
+
==== Box 2  ====
+
 
+
Article editing, etc.
+
 
+
*I would LOVE to see a "page" be called an "article". I believe page sounds like a web page and article sounds more user friendly, like a newspaper article. This may something to be done with the main namespace? We do want to be consistent though to avoid confusion. Some indicate that some pages are not articles...like portal pages, tools, charts. I would like to see examples of those besides portals as they are going away. At this point, I personally say that a newspaper may have an "article" of a chart, picture, tools, etc. so why can we not? Not that we have to function just like Wikipedia, but they also call them articles.  
+
*Discussion or Talk? This seems to be an inconsistency! Also, same for "My Talk".
+
 
+
==== Box 3  ====
+
 
+
Searching &amp; browsing
+
 
+
*How about changing button to "Keyword search"???
+
*Browsing is a form of searching. Put Country &amp; Category on same line. Used "Category" instead of "Topic" to be consistent.
+
 
+
==== Box 4  ====
+
 
+
Toolbox
+
 
+
==== Box 5  ====
+
 
+
Personal Tools
+
 
+
*Instead of having name, how about "My User Page".
+
*Add easy access to "My Sandbox"???
+
*Sign out only in one spot . . . the header.
+
 
+
=== Comments on side bar  ===
+
 
+
Please add your comments. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 20:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
+
 
+
===== Nice...  =====
+
 
+
I like what you've done. I've tossed in my comments in various spots below. In regards to the top box: I would rename Help to "Getting Started", since it navigates to the Help Options page. I would not have been as lost if Help had been called Getting Started, when I wanted to create my first page or was looking for all the help categories. [[User:Tomhuber|Tom Huber]] 04:32, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
+
 
+
===== Personal Tools  =====
+
 
+
Box 5 Personal Tools - Instead of having name, how about "My User Page" ... If every user's page was labeled "My User Page" then I wouldn't know whose page I was viewing. I'm sure that I would recognize my own user page, but determining who was who on other user pages might be difficult. --[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 18:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)  
+
  
 
<br>  
 
<br>  
  
<br>
+
:Hi, I'm guessing your question is not specifically about searching in the wiki, but the main search of [[FamilySearch.org]]. Your question would therefore be better directed to one of the [https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/forumdisplay.php?f=82 FamilySearch.org forums] as it is likely there to attract more attention to the people in the know. That being said I recently found a blog post, ''[http://britishheritage4um.blogspot.com/2011/08/ten-powerful-search-features-in.html TEN POWERFUL “SEARCH” FEATURES IN THE FAMILYSEARCH.ORG SEARCH ENGINE!]'' which you may find useful. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] {{toolbar|[[User talk:Cottrells|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cottrells|contribs]]}} 20:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  
:I am not sure that I understand . . . the items in that box are YOUR personal tools. It ALWAYS goes to YOUR User Page (this text never changes for any given logged on user) and never goes to someone else's user page. You can always tell whose page you are by the title of the page. In other words, the suggestion was made to only change the user name in Personal Tools to "My User Page", not anywhere else. Am I confused (I know I need more sleep)? [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 02:43, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
+
<br> I am fairly sure this person is NOT&nbsp;speaking about FamilySearch.org but about Wiki FamilySearch as I tried the same subject also, and although I did find one article about one county in England, the rest of the references were to places in the United States.&nbsp; Again it would be helpful to have a Guide to getting the best results out of searching the Wiki, especially when trying to help patrons.&nbsp; Marling McReynolds, Miranda Branch, Eureka CA stake.
<blockquote>I'm not even sure we have the option to change this feature from using the User Name to "My User Page" I think that is part of Mediawiki or the skin. [[User:Tomhuber|Tom Huber]] 04:37, 19 March 2010 (UTC) </blockquote>
+
===== Don't move nav bar before NGS  =====
+
  
Moving the nav bar from the right to the left will ruin the layout of a lot of pages that have been adjusted since the last move. We do not have time before NGS&nbsp;to correct&nbsp;this. [[User:RitcheyMT|RitcheyMT]] 04:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
+
== Viewing Images on FHC Computers  ==
  
I agree that it shouldn't be moved immediately, but to follow Wikipedia's lead, it works better on the left. (The new skin may negate that entirely') [[User:Tomhuber|Tom Huber]] 04:32, 19 March 2010 (UTC)<br>  
+
I read somewhere an article about a new imaging program the church is using when viewing records. It only showed a protion of a page rather then the whole page. I can't find that information again. Can someone tell me where I can find that info. I want all of our consultants to become familiar with it. <span style="font-size: 90%">— Preceding [[FamilySearch Wiki:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Hoosier1|Hoosier1]] ([[User talk:Hoosier1|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Hoosier1|contribs]]) 20:02, November 2, 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned -->  
  
===== Search button on left, Exact Match on right =====
+
== Changing images on the Main Page ==
  
Since Search is the proper search by default, its button should be on the left. [[User:RitcheyMT|RitcheyMT]] 04:04, 18 March 2010 (UTC)  
+
Images are often changed on the Main Page, which is good. However often the image that is added to the Main Page has only recently been uploaded to the wiki. The problem with this is that due to the wiki using a number of servers, the image when uploaded is not immediately available on all the possible servers. This results in some users finding the newly added image missing and rather than the picture they see a redlink to where the picture has been loaded except that it is not available on the particular server they've connected to. As the Main Page is a high visibility page I suggest that images should only be added to the Main Page only after they have been uploaded to the wiki for a day or so, just to be sure that all servers have been updated with the image. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] {{toolbar|[[User talk:Cottrells|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cottrells|contribs]]}} 14:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)  
  
===== Not all pages are articles =====
+
== Undocumented images ==
  
While the word article is friendlier than page, many, many&nbsp;wiki pages are not articles. [[User:RitcheyMT|RitcheyMT]] 04:17, 18 March 2010 (UTC)&nbsp;
+
Please continue to change the images on the Main Page frequently. It helps to draw interest among readers.  
  
Agreed. Using page in place of article, particular on help pages, is more descriptive of what the user is working on (not to mention section editing or writing). [[User:Tomhuber|Tom Huber]] 04:32, 19 March 2010 (UTC)<br>
+
However, especially on the Main Page it is crucial our Wiki's source documentation and copyright status be above question or reproach. Lately, many of the images on the Main Page have '''''not&nbsp;''''' been source documented, and therefore the copyright status could be called into question. For example, consider today's three images:
  
===== Preserve&nbsp;the link to&nbsp;the 3rd most popular wiki page  =====
+
*File:Utah Lake.jpg has no formal source documentation other than "Date: February 2011 Utah Lake Wyzer17" plus the image's Metadata. There is no copyright status claim. Chances are this is Wyzer17's (a Wiki volunteer) own photo, but without proper documentation there is no way to be sure of the copyright status.
  
The [[Browse by Country|Browse by Country]]&nbsp;page, at 4,800 visits per month, is the third most popular page on the wiki, and it has a tiny bounce rate (11%) and a miniscule exit rate (4%?).&nbsp;Removing its link from the nav bar probably isn't a good idea. [[User:RitcheyMT|RitcheyMT]] 04:17, 18 March 2010 (UTC) I can't argue or disagree with the data. [[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 18:41, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
+
*The "Burned Counties Research" image File:House fire.jpg was changed immediately after I called its copyright status into question this morning. It is now File:800px-FirePhotography edit1.jpg. There is no clue to this image's origin, except it was uploaded by Wyzer17 and it has an Internet news image look about it. It claims a GNU and Creative Commons license but that cannot be verified without extensive research.
  
===== Preserve the&nbsp;Forums link =====
+
*File:Boyle County, Kentucky Courthouse.JPG has the following vague source and copyright statement: TITLE: Boyle County, Kentucky Courthouse DATE: RIGHTS STATUS: Has the right to distribute DESCRIPTION: Source: Wikipedia. WIKI: FamilySearch Wiki. Chances are the source is the Wikipedia's article about Boyle County, but no URL link is given to verify this. The copyright statement is meaningless in the Wiki.
  
It would frustrate me if&nbsp;the ''Forums'' link were&nbsp;replaced by a ''Community &amp; Forums''&nbsp;link that pointed to an article. When I need to go to forums, it's usually to report a bug. Take me straight there, not to an article where I have to hunt again for a link to the forums. [[User:RitcheyMT|RitcheyMT]] 04:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
+
For all three images today the source and copyright status can be called into question and should be a concern. I believe we need to do better, especially on this showcase landing page.  
  
I don't use the wiki forums link, but have added a favorite to my browser. If I'm on a computer I haven't used before, I'll access the forums from http://labs.familysearch.org/. [[User:Tomhuber|Tom Huber]] 04:32, 19 March 2010 (UTC)<br>  
+
 +
::The source of these images needs to be properly documented so we can quickly verify the copyright status.<br>
  
I agree with Michael. The Forums link needs to remain a link that takes the user directly to the Forums. [[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 18:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 
  
===== Browsing isn't searching  =====
+
PLEASE, let's insist on properly source documented, and appropriately licensed images especially on the Main Page.  
 
+
Browsing isn't searching, which is why I missed the Browse By Country link earlier. Please don't hide it under the Search box. [[User:RitcheyMT|RitcheyMT]] 04:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC) Agree [[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 18:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
+
 
+
===== Leave username; not "My User Page"  =====
+
 
+
Project leaders help users all the time. When doing this, it is useful for the nav bar link that points to&nbsp;the userpage to be a username like&nbsp;[[User:RitcheyMT|RitcheyMT]] rather than the words [[User:RitcheyMT|My User Page]] because helpers and the folks they help keep switching who is logged in during the help session. It'd be a pain to have to scroll up to the top of the page to see who is logged in and then to scroll back down to the bottom to click the link to the userpage.
+
 
+
Also, that link becomes an IP&nbsp;address for users who aren't logged in. So if I think I'm logged in and I want to go to my userpage, I glance at the link to click it. If it says my username, I click that knowing I'm logged in and I'll go to the right place. If I'm not logged in I'll see an IP address, which tells me to log in, which is helpful. If instead the link said "My User Page," I'd just click the link (thinking I'm still logged in) and end up on an IP userpage, which would just confuse me.
+
 
+
A third reason to preserve the link as a username instead of changing it to "My User Page" is the use case of library useage. If I'm contributing to the wiki from a public computer and I walk away, and someone else sits down, I want them to see that the link in question is going to take them to RitcheyMT's page rather than their user page.
+
 
+
I'm&nbsp;guessing there are other reasons why MediaWiki is designed that way, but these&nbsp;are the three use cases I&nbsp;could imagine.&nbsp;;)&nbsp; [[User:RitcheyMT|RitcheyMT]] 04:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
+
 
+
I think the use of My User Page is just a placeholder. The skins will either display the user's name with a user icon or if th person isn't signed in, they will only see "Sign in" under this heading — at least, that's my experience on these Mediawiki sites. [[User:Tomhuber|Tom Huber]] 04:32, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
+
 
+
<br>
+
  
Personal Tools Addition: How about adding a link to Your Current Support Cases up at the top of the page or under Personal Tools. Each time, it takes me about ten minutes of hunting around to try to find where it is. Having to remember that I have to 1) click Help, 2) click Contact Family Search and then 3) View your existing cases to get there is NOT intuitive. It would be much better to have it under Personal Tools - two entries. One for "Submit a problem" and one for Your Current Support Cases. There is no reason to have to do so many clicks to find it. I actually had to call the library in SLC the first time to ask how I could submit a problem with the website. And I never can remember how to get here after that.<br>
+
[[User:DiltsGD|DiltsGD]] 17:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)  
  
== Alternative layout for the Main Page  ==
+
:I agree with David's suggestion/plea. It's important to use the {{tl|Information}} template and to use it as documented. The source field should include a link (if available). The date and author fields should be about when the image/work was created not when and who uploaded it (that information is already captured).--[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] {{toolbar|[[User talk:Cottrells|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cottrells|contribs]]}} 08:16, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  
{{User:Cottrells/Sandbox/MainPage}}
+
::By 13 February the WikiProject Utah image had changed to File:800px-Goblin Valley State Park, Utah.jpg, yet another main page image with a slip-shod source identification. As the image title implies it is about Goblin Valley State Park, and yet the identification statement says it is from Dead Horse Point State Park! The credit is given to Wikipedia with no indication of the article where the image was found. Nor is a URL address for the image given. [[User:DiltsGD|DiltsGD]] 17:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  
=== Comments ===
+
== Restructure the Home Page ==
  
I would like to suggest that the Main Page be reformatted to include a Welcome header with some links to key categories, followed by two main columns divided between ''using'' the wiki on the left and ''contributing'' to the wiki on the right. I feel it is important to emphasise these two main reasons why a person may visit the wiki.  
+
What are the most important elements of the wiki home page? Would you like to be a part of helping to make the Wiki Home page an easier entry point for the different people who use and contribute to the wiki? Chime in [https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=14228 in this forum thread]. -- [[User:VasquezJL|janellv]] {{toolbar|[[User talk:VasquezJL|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/VasquezJL|contribs]]}} 20:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
  
There is still space in the right hand column where more information could be added, plus more wikilinks could be added to the text already included or the text can be changed. Please feel free to look at or edit the code that produces this layout, using the links provided at the bottom of the proposal. Your comments would also be appreciated. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 18:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
+
== Image copyright concerns  ==
  
:*I like some of this. My personal preference is that I do not like the color palettes in the templates. These templates also make it more difficult for the less technical people to edit. I realize this is all temporary anyway. To me, it is not much more inviting than the current one. Anyway, my opinions. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 20:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
+
Replaced the old blue sky version of this statue because of copyright concerns as indicated in the talk page at {{Commons|User talk:Erasoft24}} last entry indicates probable copyright violation.  
:*Honestly, I prefer the clean boxes compared to all the images. Some images on the main page are good, but too many images makes it busy and confusing. I'm not concerned about the colors because they can easily be changed. I'm also not worried about the content because that can be changed as well. I'm also not concerned that editing the boxes on the home page might be difficult for the majority of our current editors/authors. The home page typically ends up being protected so that only the few who need to make edits can do so. [[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 18:39, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
+
:*Yeah, we have got both opposite responses about the images. Many have felt they are cleaner &amp; more inviting, some thought they are busy &amp; confusing. I realize that the main page does not get edited much nor by very many people. However, I believe in a greater amount of consistency throughout the entire Wiki. Both mock-ups do have some problem with this, but it seems one has more issues than the other. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 20:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
+
  
== April 2010 - Main Page proposed layout below the search box  ==
+
This white background image was apparently photographed and uploaded by the author, himself.
  
{{User:Cottrells/MainPage}}
+
[[User:DiltsGD|DiltsGD]] 17:00, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
  
=== Comments  ===
 
  
Based on the information shared at the [[Technical Meeting Agenda 6 April 2010|April 6 Wiki Techinical meeting]], the [http://forums.familysearch.org/en/showthread.php?t=2323 ''The Research Wiki is . . .'' thread] and discussion with [[User:CK Whipple|Kara]] I have put together another proposed layout for the main page. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 14:43, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 
  
:I like some of the things on the [[Main Page]]. I see some of the changes I suggested have been corrected. To me, the "Browse by Country" text is redundant and not needed when it is followed by the "List All Countries" link. Actually, this link is really redundant &amp; inconsistent with the "Browse by country" link in the Navigation box. I would rather see this consistent. Could we also list the "Browse by topic" as well? The "Featured Articles" layout seem to be our attempt to copy what other Wikis are doing. Are all of the good ideas already taken? Do we not have any other creativity? To me, just listing the article title is not as inviting to read the article. It would seem that a teaser may be more inviting. To me, the page is in general not terribly inviting. Yes, I realize that it may be all temporary though. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 17:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
+
Removed templates for copyright and source concerns on this page, so that they won't show up on our maintenance list. &nbsp;The person putting images on the Main page now knows how to handle those correctly.[[User:Averyld|Lynda]] 19:42, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:42, 21 May 2012

Contents

changing the Main Page?

Today we changed the Main Page, instead of putting a new Featured Article up we put up a WikiProject, what do you think about that? We like the idea because then the project isn't buried. What if we had Featured Articles and one WikiProject each week on the Main Page? Dawne 17:32, 15 August 2011 (UTC) Featured Article Committee Member

Search criteria

A guide on how to get the best results from a search would be appreciated, i.e., is order importent, what triggers the search, how are the words searched for prioritized? I ask this as I searched for LDS membership records in England in the 1800s. All I got was various demoninations in the USA. I just don't understand how the algorithm works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laytonr1 (talk | contribs) 04:37, October 28, 2011 (UTC)


Hi, I'm guessing your question is not specifically about searching in the wiki, but the main search of FamilySearch.org. Your question would therefore be better directed to one of the FamilySearch.org forums as it is likely there to attract more attention to the people in the know. That being said I recently found a blog post, TEN POWERFUL “SEARCH” FEATURES IN THE FAMILYSEARCH.ORG SEARCH ENGINE! which you may find useful. --Steve (talk| contribs) 20:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


I am fairly sure this person is NOT speaking about FamilySearch.org but about Wiki FamilySearch as I tried the same subject also, and although I did find one article about one county in England, the rest of the references were to places in the United States.  Again it would be helpful to have a Guide to getting the best results out of searching the Wiki, especially when trying to help patrons.  Marling McReynolds, Miranda Branch, Eureka CA stake.

Viewing Images on FHC Computers

I read somewhere an article about a new imaging program the church is using when viewing records. It only showed a protion of a page rather then the whole page. I can't find that information again. Can someone tell me where I can find that info. I want all of our consultants to become familiar with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoosier1 (talk | contribs) 20:02, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

Changing images on the Main Page

Images are often changed on the Main Page, which is good. However often the image that is added to the Main Page has only recently been uploaded to the wiki. The problem with this is that due to the wiki using a number of servers, the image when uploaded is not immediately available on all the possible servers. This results in some users finding the newly added image missing and rather than the picture they see a redlink to where the picture has been loaded except that it is not available on the particular server they've connected to. As the Main Page is a high visibility page I suggest that images should only be added to the Main Page only after they have been uploaded to the wiki for a day or so, just to be sure that all servers have been updated with the image. --Steve (talk| contribs) 14:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Undocumented images

Please continue to change the images on the Main Page frequently. It helps to draw interest among readers.

However, especially on the Main Page it is crucial our Wiki's source documentation and copyright status be above question or reproach. Lately, many of the images on the Main Page have not  been source documented, and therefore the copyright status could be called into question. For example, consider today's three images:

  • File:Utah Lake.jpg has no formal source documentation other than "Date: February 2011 Utah Lake Wyzer17" plus the image's Metadata. There is no copyright status claim. Chances are this is Wyzer17's (a Wiki volunteer) own photo, but without proper documentation there is no way to be sure of the copyright status.
  • The "Burned Counties Research" image File:House fire.jpg was changed immediately after I called its copyright status into question this morning. It is now File:800px-FirePhotography edit1.jpg. There is no clue to this image's origin, except it was uploaded by Wyzer17 and it has an Internet news image look about it. It claims a GNU and Creative Commons license but that cannot be verified without extensive research.
  • File:Boyle County, Kentucky Courthouse.JPG has the following vague source and copyright statement: TITLE: Boyle County, Kentucky Courthouse DATE: RIGHTS STATUS: Has the right to distribute DESCRIPTION: Source: Wikipedia. WIKI: FamilySearch Wiki. Chances are the source is the Wikipedia's article about Boyle County, but no URL link is given to verify this. The copyright statement is meaningless in the Wiki.

For all three images today the source and copyright status can be called into question and should be a concern. I believe we need to do better, especially on this showcase landing page.


The source of these images needs to be properly documented so we can quickly verify the copyright status.


PLEASE, let's insist on properly source documented, and appropriately licensed images especially on the Main Page.

DiltsGD 17:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

I agree with David's suggestion/plea. It's important to use the {{Information}} template and to use it as documented. The source field should include a link (if available). The date and author fields should be about when the image/work was created not when and who uploaded it (that information is already captured).--Steve (talk| contribs) 08:16, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
By 13 February the WikiProject Utah image had changed to File:800px-Goblin Valley State Park, Utah.jpg, yet another main page image with a slip-shod source identification. As the image title implies it is about Goblin Valley State Park, and yet the identification statement says it is from Dead Horse Point State Park! The credit is given to Wikipedia with no indication of the article where the image was found. Nor is a URL address for the image given. DiltsGD 17:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Restructure the Home Page

What are the most important elements of the wiki home page? Would you like to be a part of helping to make the Wiki Home page an easier entry point for the different people who use and contribute to the wiki? Chime in in this forum thread. -- janellv (talk| contribs) 20:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Image copyright concerns

Replaced the old blue sky version of this statue because of copyright concerns as indicated in the talk page at User talk:Erasoft24 last entry indicates probable copyright violation.

This white background image was apparently photographed and uploaded by the author, himself.

DiltsGD 17:00, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


Removed templates for copyright and source concerns on this page, so that they won't show up on our maintenance list.  The person putting images on the Main page now knows how to handle those correctly.Lynda 19:42, 21 May 2012 (UTC)