Old microfilm number conversion 25890-25894Edit This Page

From FamilySearch Wiki

Revision as of 16:25, 19 February 2013 by BodilyLA (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

[Go to previous page]

Old microfilm number conversion of Family History Library numbers used before 1973 may be accomplished with the table below:

Old Serial Part No. New Number Old Serial Part No. New Number Old Serial Part No. New Number
025890 00007 0189400 025890  00036 0189429 025893  00008 0189458
  00008 0189401   00037 0189430   00009 0189459
  00009 0189402   00038 0189431   00010 0189460
  00010 0189403   00039 0189432   00011 0189461
  00011 0189404   00040 0189433   00012 0189462
  00012 0189405   00041 0189434   00013 0189463
  00013 0189406   00042 0189435   00014 0189464
  00014 0189407   00043 0189436   00015 0189465
  00015 0189408   00044 0189437   00016 0189466
  00016 0189409   00045 0189438   00017 0189467
  00017 0189410   00046 0189439   00018 0189468
  00018 0189411   00047 0189440   00019 0189469
  00019 0189412   00048 0189441   00020 0189470
  00020 0189413   00049 0189442   00021 0189471
  00021 0189414   00050 0189443   00022 0189472
  00022 0189415 025891 00001 0189444   00023 0189473
  00023 0189416   00002 0189445   00024 0189474
  00024 0189417   00003 0189446 025894 00001 0189475
  00025 0189418   00004 0189447   00002 0189476
  00026 0189419   00005 0189448   00003 0189477
  00027 0189420   00006 0189449   00004 0189478
  00028 0189421 025892   0189450   00005 0189479
  00029 0189422 025893 00001 0189451   00006 0189480
  00030 0189423   00002 0189452   00007 0189481
  00031 0189424   00003 0189453   00008 0189482
  00032 0189425   00004 0189454   00009 0189483
  00033 0189426   00005 0189455   00010 0189484
  00034 0189427   00006 0189456   00011 0189485
  00035 0189428   00007 0189457   00012 0189486

 [Go to next page]


 

Need additional research help? Contact our research help specialists.

Need wiki, indexing, or website help? Contact our product teams.


Did you find this article helpful?

You're invited to explain your rating on the discussion page (you must be signed in).